Reducing poverty in nepal by reducing disaster risks

But its major city Chengdu remained unaffected mostly due to the use of earthquake resistant construction employed. Kathmandu has experienced massive, poorly controlled urbanisation in the last few years and now has a population of around 5 million.

Share via Email Nepal's capital, Kathmandu, is considered to be particularly vulnerable to a natural disaster. One of these is Nepaland in particular its capital, Kathmandu.

What can be done to avoid this impending seismic disaster. Action is being taken.

Preparing for future shocks – disaster risk reduction in Nepal

In other countries, a full Ministry or at least a Department is the responsible institution while in Nepal the erstwhile Department of Disaster Prevention and Narcotics was reduced to a Unit and is now a mere shadow of its former shelf, a solitary Emergency Operation Center exists in the precincts of the Home Ministry.

To create an environment conducive to stable diversified livelihood options, it is essential for development planners to see disasters as an unresolved problem of development and, integrate disaster preparedness plans into the development process.

This page is no longer updated, but the information is retained for reference. It is difficult to know precisely where the next disaster will strike, but there are countries and cities that must be on a higher state of alert. Similarly, the coping strategies poor households may select faced with scarcity include overgrazing, deforestation or unsustainable extraction of water resources.

Though floods, landslides, fire manifest as disasters in annual basis, earthquake is the most towering of the disasters in the country. For this the local Government has to be proactive and be able to work fast like Mayor Bob Parker of Christchurch did. We need to act with the same unity in preparing for these shocks in advance to make sure we do all we can to avert and minimise the damage a natural disaster can cause.

Recent disasters have seen dozens of countries step in to help others in their hour of need. There is a serious lack of investment in critical infrastructure like schools and hospitals.

A survey by the Kathmandu Valley Earthquake Risk Management Project pdf suggests around 40, would die, withinjured, plus tens of thousands left homeless. Although relief is essential in cases of sudden disasters, the over emphasis on relief provision in the aftermath of a disaster situation does not help to reduce these communities long term vulnerability, nor does it equip them to face a future disaster situation.

But this will not be enough by itself. In this context, the work carries out by the reducing vulnerability theme aims at: When microfinance schemes and social protection are available, households are less likely to adopt damaging coping capacities UNISDR, b.

First, anticipation and a stronger focus on preparing for disasters. But it's also about investing in the government's ability to respond; creating disaster management plans; and educating people about disaster risks.

Kathmandu has experienced massive, poorly controlled urbanisation in the last few years and now has a population of around 5 million. There is growing evidence that building community resilience to shocks is more cost effective than humanitarian response.

This could be a conservative estimate. Social protection includes safety nets social assistance and non-contributory transfers such as cash transfers, school feeding, targeted food assistance and subsidiesand social insurance such as old-age, survivorship, disability pensions, and unemployment insurance.

Second, its lack of development and its deep-rooted poverty leave it underprepared and extremely vulnerable. Poverty is therefore both a cause and consequence of disaster risk Wisner et al. Ashdown's Humanitarian Emergency Response Review offers a number of suggestions for what we could be doing now to prepare more effectively for a major disaster in Nepal, through the consortium.

Featuring among the world’s twenty poorest countries, Nepal ranks fourth in terms of climate change impact, eleventh in terms of earthquake risk and thirtieth in terms of flood risk.

In April 25,magnitude earthquake stroke in Nepal affecting eight million population and killing 8, people. Nepal has made successful strides in reducing poverty from percent in to percent in But these numbers belie a harsh reality: huge disparities and.

Disasters big threat to reducing extreme poverty says ODI

infrastructure, complexity of poverty, social inequality, political and economic value, the types of hazard faced and potential impact of framework for disaster risk reduction in Nepal - We need to develop a multi-sectoral urban risk management strategy and action plan to ensure all sectors, such as health and education, are.

Disaster Risk Sensitive Land Use Planning. A common concern of local development planners is the lack of tools and methodologies to identify and analyze disaster risks in localities and incorporate them in to the development plans.

This could be a conservative estimate. Confronted with the growing base of evidence, we should be asking ourselves what we can do to reduce this risk. Disaster preparedness in Kathmandu is poor. The Nepalese government's capacity and investment in disaster management remains low, hamstrung by bureaucracy and political stasis.

This is nearing completion and Nepal will become the second country in the region after India to develop a national plan in line with the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.

Over 118,800 people Reducing poverty in nepal by reducing disaster risks
Rated 3/5 based on 43 review
Reducing vulnerability | South Asia | Practical Action